Hamas' October 7 Attacks: A Bid To Sabotage The Israel-Saudi Deal?

Hugo van Dijk

5 min read

Post on May 19, 2025

4.6

Share

H2: Hamas' Strategic Goals and the Timing of the Attacks

Hamas, a Palestinian Islamist group that governs the Gaza Strip, vehemently opposes any form of normalization between Israel and Arab states. Their ideology views such agreements as a betrayal of the Palestinian cause and a legitimization of Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories. The timing of the October 7th attacks, coinciding with sensitive negotiations for an Israel-Saudi deal, strongly suggests a deliberate attempt to disrupt this progress.

H3: Disrupting the Normalization Process:

Hamas likely calculated the potential benefits of such a bold move. By launching a large-scale attack, they aimed to:

• Increased international focus on the conflict: Diverting attention away from the ongoing negotiations and shifting the global spotlight to the immediate crisis.
• Strengthening anti-normalization sentiment within the Arab world: Exploiting the outrage and fear generated by the attacks to galvanize opposition to the Israel-Saudi deal within the Arab public and political spheres.
• Potentially triggering a major escalation: Creating a situation where the ongoing conflict overshadows the possibility of a negotiated settlement, effectively making an agreement impossible in the short term.

H3: Internal Palestinian Politics:

Beyond external strategic goals, the attacks may also reflect Hamas' internal political calculations. The group might have sought to:

• Assert dominance over other Palestinian factions: Demonstrating their power and influence within the Palestinian territories, potentially undermining the authority of the Palestinian Authority (PA).
• Gain popular support among Palestinians frustrated with the PA: Capitalizing on existing resentment towards the PA's policies and perceived failures to deliver for the Palestinian people.
• Shifting international attention towards Hamas' agenda: Using the attacks to refocus global attention on their demands and grievances, potentially gaining leverage in future negotiations.

H2: The Israel-Saudi Deal: A Potential Game Changer

The potential normalization agreement between Israel and Saudi Arabia represents a significant geopolitical shift.

H3: The Deal's Potential Benefits and Challenges:

For Israel, the deal promises enhanced regional security and the opportunity to integrate further into the regional economy. Saudi Arabia stands to gain economically and to enhance its regional standing and influence. However, significant challenges remain:

• Improved regional security for Israel: Reduced threats from hostile neighbors and potentially improved intelligence sharing.
• Economic gains for both countries: Increased trade, investment, and technological cooperation.
• Enhanced regional stability: A potential catalyst for further peace agreements in the Middle East.
• Opposition from Iran and other actors: Significant resistance from groups opposed to normalization, including Iran, which views the deal as a strategic setback.

H3: The Impact of the Attacks on Negotiations:

The October 7th attacks have undeniably cast a long shadow over the Israel-Saudi negotiations.

• Increased mistrust and tension between Israel and Saudi Arabia: The attacks have heightened security concerns and may make Saudi Arabia more hesitant to move forward with the deal.
• Potential suspension of talks: The immediate focus on addressing the aftermath of the attacks may lead to a temporary or even permanent halt in negotiations.
• Demand for stronger security guarantees: Israel may demand more robust security commitments from Saudi Arabia before proceeding with normalization.
• Increased scrutiny of Hamas' role in the region: The international community is likely to place renewed emphasis on combating Hamas and other militant groups.

H2: International Response and Geopolitical Implications

The international community responded to the Hamas attacks with widespread condemnation.

H3: Global Condemnation and International Pressure:

• UN Security Council resolutions: Calls for an immediate end to hostilities and support for efforts to de-escalate the conflict.
• International sanctions against Hamas: Increased pressure to isolate Hamas financially and politically.
• Increased military aid to Israel: Provision of additional resources to help Israel defend itself against future attacks.
• Diplomatic efforts to de-escalate the situation: Initiatives by various international actors to facilitate a ceasefire and prevent further escalation.

H3: Shifting Geopolitical Dynamics in the Middle East:

The attacks have undeniably altered the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East:

• Increased tensions between Israel and its neighbors: Escalating the already precarious security situation in the region.
• Shifts in regional power dynamics: Potentially impacting existing alliances and power balances.
• Potential for increased proxy conflicts: The attacks may embolden other militant groups and lead to increased violence.
• Renewed focus on counter-terrorism efforts: A resurgence of international efforts to combat terrorism and extremism.

3. Conclusion: Assessing the Link Between the Attacks and the Israel-Saudi Deal

The evidence suggests a strong possibility that the October 7th Hamas attacks were a calculated attempt to sabotage the Israel-Saudi normalization deal. The timing, Hamas' stated opposition to normalization, and the potential strategic benefits for the group all point towards a deliberate effort to disrupt the peace process. Whether this attempt will ultimately be successful remains to be seen. The future trajectory of both the Israel-Saudi deal and the broader conflict in the Middle East depends heavily on the evolving geopolitical landscape and the responses of various actors. Continue following the developments related to the Hamas' October 7 attacks and the Israel-Saudi deal; understanding this crucial geopolitical juncture requires continuous vigilance and informed discussion. Further research and open dialogue are vital in navigating this complex and critical period.